Tag: feminists

”You’re not entitled to sex, incel.”

”You’re not entitled to sex, deal with it.” is a common response feminists have when they are confronted with the problem of male sexlessness, sometimes referred to as involuntary celibacy, hence the word in(voluntary)cel(ibate).

Right away, I already think this is rather presumptious. Who said someone is entitled? I’m not denying there are of course incels who say they are entitled to sex no matter what, but to immediately accuse someone of entitlement simply because they are stating their dissatisfaction with a circumstance is the result of a flawed thought process.

”I’m sad I don’t have friends.”

AH SO YOU THINK YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO A HOLD A GUN TO PEOPLE’S HEADS AND FORCE THEM TO BE YOUR FRIENDS???

”I’m sad my mother died.”

AH SO YOU THINK YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO HOLD A GUN TO RANDOM WOMEN’S HEADS AND FORCE THEM TO PRETEND TO BE YOUR MOMMY???

”I’m a cripple and I always wanted to be an athlete with real legs, this makes me sad.”

AH SO YOU THINK YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO CUT EVERYONE’S LEGS OFF AND ATTACH THEM TO YOURSELF??? PIECE OF SHIT SCUM!!!

This is absurd, who said that if you voice your dissatisfaction as a way of relieving yourself, you must necessarily believe to be entitled to something?

Is this how to sensibly react to someone’s suffering? If someone is dissatisfied with x circumstance, we should immediately accuse them of being entitled pricks? Somehow ”I wanted to have lots of sex but I can’t because I’m ugly and/or socially disabled in some way” earns this type of scorn response in particular.

Likewise, if it is supposed to be advice, it is flawed – that also seems to be the perception of many of these ignorant feminists, that the suffering is caused by your sense of entitlement, rather than something deeper. So you just get rid of that sense of entitlement somehow and the problem is solved in their deluded minds.

It is a common form of gaslighting abuse feminists engage in towards sexually unsuccessful men, they deny the suffering caused by phenomena easily explained by evolution, and pretend that is is all just coming from some patriarchy rape culture conspiracy against them.

I think that not having sex causes men suffering because evolution simply favors what results in survival, so it made it so that men experience suffering when they don’t release their seed in a warm wet hole, because that is one of many ways to encourage that they will reproduce – to pretend that the suffering is caused just by some kind of social construct giving men a sense of entitlement is gaslighting abuse.

”You dumb incels only want sex because you see sex on the evil rape culture television everywhere, it’s not like sex is used in commercials because men are already naturally interested in sex, NO, men are only interested in sex because they have been indoctrinated by the evil rape culture television!”

Another crucial aspect to bring up here is the lie that they are only saying incels are not entitled to sex and their hypocrisy.

The lie (or delusion) is that many of these feminists are supposedly just saying you cannot take sex forcefully, i.e ”you’re not entitled to rape” pretty much – but that is not all they are saying.

Guess who the most incel-hating cunts are? The same ones who are also in principle opposed to prostitution, pornography or sex dolls.

So it is not just ”you can’t take sex forcefully”, it is also:

”Even if a woman agrees to let you stick it in for a certain price, it still isn’t ok because she wants money and not sex, so the sex is unwanted and unwanted sex is rape, so basically all work is slavery because the baker is only baking bread for money, not because they want to bake bread, so it is unwanted work, which is slavery, wah wah wah, I just want you to remain sexless for the rest of your life and suffer horrifically!!!”

and it is also:

”But pornography COULD be abusive, sometimes women are abused in that industry, so maybe you are watching a video in which someone was abused for free without contributing to the abuse because you watched it for free and they don’t even know you exist, so that must be banned, although even real life violence and gore videos of decapitations are perfectly legal if you’re only watching them for free, despite containing DEFINITE violence! We only care about censoring sex! Animated child porn=wrong because it’s child abuse but horror movie=acceptable!”

and it might also be:

”But what if you get used to fucking a sex doll and then your male pea brain can’t distinguish between the sex doll and a real woman anymore, so you go out and start sexually assaulting women because you think they’re sex dolls? Also, how old is your sex doll??? OMG I’m so disgusted right now, your sex doll looks like she’s still underage! Fucking child rapist you deserve to be castrated!!!!!!!!!!!!”

So these people have no right to claim it is just about incels not being allowed to force someone to have sex with them, they want in fact all sexual outlets to be banned.

Then their hypocrisy – sometimes they seem to think females are entitled to male attention but not the other way around.

If you tell them you can’t be friends with a girl anymore because it is tormenting to have her tits dangled in front of you and not being able to touch, they will accuse you of acting entitled for not being able to bear the friendship anymore, as if somehow the female in that situation is entitled to a male friend.

Another one would be you find out that your wife did some sex act you’re interested in (deepthroat, anal, fisting, etc) with someone in the past when she was still young and fresh, but not with you, so you divorce her to avoid that frustration/suffering of being the settled for second choice. Again, many here will say this is the man acting entitled, but why is the wife entitled to a marriage?

If you’re going with the ”you’re entitled to nothing in this life! NOTHING!” standard, why are women entitled to attention from men on the other hand? It goes both ways.

On circumcision/genital mutilation.

I think circumcision generally falls under what we can refer to as unnecessary harm, I don’t support it.

1 – It’s painful in the moment or afterwards.

Either while you’re being circumcised if it’s done by some primitive religious moron without anesthesia, or definitely afterwards.

Perhaps if you’re young enough while it happens, you won’t remember it later, but I fail to see how that is supposed to be a justification. Let’s say I could torture someone for hours, but then give them a hypothetical pill that will make them forget all of it.

The fact that the torture happened in the moment while they were being tortured is bad enough, it doesn’t matter if they remember or forget it.

2 – It can also cause long term suffering by decreasing your ability to obtain sexual relief/satisfaction.

Here people will of course argue back and forth about if circumcision has any effect on your sexual pleasure or not. Some will claim yes it decreased their ability to feel pleasure (I am in that category), some might even say it increased their ability to feel pleasure to get cut because they had some kind of problem with their tight foreskin beforehand and just didn’t use all options to try to retract them, whatever it may be.

But just looking at the most obvious facts, it seems non-sensical to me to claim it has no decreasing effect. Yes, you are cutting skin that contains sensitive nerves off of your dick (it’d be weird if that in itself didn’t take any feelings away), and once that is done, your glans will no longer be constantly protected by anything wrapped around it, so it’s free to rub against your pants all the time, prone to the process of keratinization.

Forcing an internal organ to be an external organ, so to speak. Would it not be reasonable to say that if instead of walking on your feet, you learned to walk on your hands, your hands would become kind of desensitized over time? I play guitar, so the fingers that I put on the strings become less sensitive over time, they’re constantly exposed to pressure.

If you constantly expose something and it is not protected, it generally tends to become less sensitive to fine touch, yes. Does that take some kind of Einstein genius to come up with that theory?

3 – Benefits seem little to non-existent to make up for the harm/loss.

Hygiene? Do you live in a third world shithole with no access to soap? I doubt it anyway though, I know just from my personal experience in the past that when I sweat and jizzed, and I have no protective skin around my glans to stop lints and dirt from getting stuck in and glued to my glans, it does in fact get stuck in and glue to my glans. How exactly is that more hygienic?

But whatever, yes, wash yourself.

Less likely to get certain STDs? Contraception, again, not impossible, no need to resort to such drastic measures when it can be solved more comfortably.

Penile cancer? Almost no one gets penile cancer, you can also take other measures not to get cancer like living a healthy lifestyle/not smoking, and wouldn’t that also justify cutting all girls breasts off because then they can never get cancer in them? Breast cancer is certainly more likely than cancer in your genitals, penile cancer is extremely rare.

How about you just ask them what they want if it’s not absolutely necessary? Same for your tonsils even, I don’t think it would have as negative of an effect on someone as being circumcised or having breasts cut off, but still, why do it if it’s completely unnecessary in that moment?

Yes, if you cut x part of your body off, that part cannot become infected or riddled with cancer anymore…so therefore cut it all off?

Phimosis? This is the only one that is kind of more controversial, but it’s not really unsolvable either, there are specific creams and stretching exercises to retract your foreskin without having to cut it, and you can also only get partially circumcised and not tightly if nothing else helps.

Overall I think this is a barbaric and backward ritual, I don’t think it’s unfair or inconsiderate or anything to criticize the ones doing it, the reasons people give for it are frequently pathetically shallow.

Often it’s supported by religious morons who think children should be property, ”parents have a right to choose for children” – maybe if it’s harmless and/or necessary, but not when you’re inflicting unnecessary harm/pain/suffering on them like strapping them to a table and cutting their skin off, or beating them with a hammer, or sticking needles in them, etc based on thinking that invisible creatures exist and command you to do so.

Religion should never be an argument here, that’s just saying you live in a fantasy world and believe in invisible creatures for which you have no evidence, so that’s why you inflicting potentially intense harm/pain/suffering on others is justified, the easter bunny said I have to shove my fist in an infant’s vagina, so it’s fine basically.

Same goes for a parent’s petty aesthetic preferences, who cares what you think looks pretty? Should you also be allowed to cut up your daughter’s vagina or breasts to make them look more pleasant to your liking?

Then we have the feminist morons that are completely apathetic to any plight men face and just state that female genital mutilation is worse than male genital mutilation. It depends on how you do it is simply the answer here, so this is just wrong to categorically state FGM is worse than MGM, by default, always.

You can cut off the skin around the clitoris, this is more similar to cutting foreskin off. Some primitive cultures cut the entire vagina open, yes, but some primitive cultures also cut the entire dick open and stick their dicks in the cut open dick, it’s a matter of how you’re mutilating them.

It doesn’t matter though, I could also say ”look, feminists, anal rape is worse than sexual harassment, therefore sexual harassment isn’t a big deal, so shut the fuck up”. This is fallacy of relative privation, A and B are both bad, but B is worse than A, so therefore we’re going to pretend A is now good. Having two arms amputated is worse than only one arm, so therefore having one arm amputated somehow isn’t a big deal? That’s just non-sense.

And I’m sure you can find more obscure reasons why people do it, but these tend to be the common sayings/standards. In conclusion, I see no point in the ritual/practice.